I just read the short pamphlet ‘Merger or Renewal?’, by Michael Meadowcroft, from January 1988. (Available to download here). It’s well worth thinking about this period because (without seeking to apportion any blame), a tremendous amount of liberal energy was dissipated by the merger and associated drama, and a lot of good liberals (activists and supporters) drifted away from the Liberal Democrats and the Liberal Party altogether.*
A couple of observations struck me
especially. Meadowcroft identifies ‘that constituency of young concerned
idealists who have tended to support - and even work for – Labour because they saw no other better answer…’ [although 25
years later I think they are just as likely to wish a plague on both our
houses]. ‘Up to the Alliance the Liberal Party was able to recruit
such individuals when the party set its stall out for them. Many of our
Councillors, candidates and officers are exactly this kind of person but it has
often been a hard job persuading them to stay in
recent years. In addition all too often our rare recruits from this key group have come through personal
acquaintance with a like Liberal rather than through any indirect means. Unless we
only wish to win the plush constituencies we must appeal to those who currently
drift to Labour by default. That means addressing issues of concern to
feminists, youth, those concerned about the arts, about green issues, and about
the developing world.’ This challenge has only been intensified since 2010.
Finally, this gem could have been written in
March 2013:
*My impression is that more of them ended up not
involved in party politics than in the Greens or Labour, but I’m too young to
make a judgement from personal observation, so others might correct me.
hmmm
ReplyDelete